For Chemists, Chemical Engineers, and Bioeconomy Strategists
Why Persistence Matters More Than Yield
As engineers and scientists, we’re trained to look for process efficiency, cost per unit, and scalable integration. Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) is our go-to: it tells us if a system pencils out under known assumptions.
But many technologies that look brilliant on paper stall—or collapse—at the point of market entry, scale-up, or system shock. The culprit often isn’t the chemistry or the cost. It’s something harder to quantify:
- Misaligned incentives
- Symbolic breakdowns (“green” tech that isn’t trusted)
- Fragile coordination mechanisms
- Hidden entropy that the system can’t export
These are not business errors. They are thermodynamic imbalances in disguise.
GTESI (General Theory of Evolutionary Systems & Information) offers a structured, rigorous way to evaluate systems not just by how they work, but by whether they will persist.
Traditional Metrics vs. GTESI Diagnostics
| Metric | What It Measures | What It Misses | GTESI Adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRR | Return on invested capital over time | Ignores system volatility, symbolic decay, trust | IPR flags fragile time-value dynamics |
| TAM | Total addressable market | Assumes trust, infrastructure, and uptake | TRFI assesses real trust infrastructure |
| TRL | Technology readiness level | Stops at technical demo | EED catches entropy load at real-world scale |
| SWOT | Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats | Subjective, misses symbolic-mismatch risk | SCD quantifies narrative vs. ops divergence |
| TEA | Input/output economic modeling | Ignores entropy cost and symbolic signals | GTESI sees chaos absorption, trust resilience |
Four GTESI Diagnostic Vectors (with Examples)
1. IPR (Inverse Persistence Ratio)
Measures how much value a system creates relative to how fast it must move or be remembered.
- Where TEA fails: A process may have strong projected IRR but depends on rapid narrative churn, new funding rounds, or short-lived regulatory wins.
- GTESI insight: High IPR = low resilience. It flags when value decays faster than the system can stabilize.
2. SCD (Symbolic Compression Divergence)
Assesses the gap between a system’s public symbolism and its operational truth.
- Where SWOT fails: Marketing as “green hydrogen” while relying on fossil-fired electrons looks good on a slide deck, but fails under scrutiny.
- GTESI insight: High SCD predicts backlash, loss of trust, and devaluation, even when technical performance is excellent.
3. TRFI (Trust Ritual Failure Index)
Tracks failures in filings, certifications, multi-party coordination, and symbolic rituals that create system continuity.
- Where TAM misleads: A market may be large, but if there are no enforceable standards or harmonized filings, uptake stalls.
- GTESI insight: Trust rituals are like gaskets: invisible until they leak. TRFI detects these leaks early.
4. EED (Entropy Export Deficit)
Calculates how well a system exports its internal complexity or chaos.
- Where TEA blinds: A system may show stable unit costs but be highly sensitive to input fluctuations, policy changes, or logistical delays.
- GTESI insight: EED measures real-world fragility: when entropy builds up faster than the system can shed it, failure cascades.
GTESI Is Rigorous, Not Philosophical
- Grounded in thermodynamics (entropy, dissipation, Landauer limits)
- Builds on information theory (compression, trust encoding)
- Validated by empirical collapse and persistence case studies
- Makes falsifiable predictions (e.g., early market collapse flags, symbolic decay curves)
It is not speculative theory. It is an evaluative system that complements TEA the way structural analysis complements material strength testing.
Why Engineers Should Care
GTESI helps answer:
- Why did that rival process with worse yield win market trust?
- Why did that tech fail even after pilot success and funding?
- Why do some companies scale under chaotic conditions while others stall at the ribbon-cutting?
GTESI provides a diagnostic lens for:
- Early-stage tech screening
- Go-to-market strategy
- System integration risk
- Policy resilience assessment
Invitation, Not Prescription
You don’t need to learn a new math or abandon your models. You just need to add a layer:
Ask not just: Does it work?
Ask: Can it persist? Will it hold? What signals is it sending?
GTESI helps you answer that.
Next Step: Read the GTESI Primer or apply the diagnostic lens to a recent TEA you’ve done. What did you miss? What signs were there? What might still be hiding in plain sight?
GTESI is not about being right. It’s about seeing early, and holding on.
About the Author
